🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed ruling, the highest judicial body permitted Texas to use a newly configured congressional map that could add several five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three ruling, released on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to lift a federal judge's injunction that had invalidated the new map in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating significant confusion and upsetting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its decision.

The district court had determined that Texas had likely grouped voters by their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the boundaries. It had mandated the state to use the districts drawn after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Strong Dissent

With a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's action. She argued that it disrespected the work of the district court, pointing out that its opinion was written by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order ensures that Texas's new map, with all its increased favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, without justification, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a infraction of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Battle

The court's action comes amid a countrywide fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican majority. Ordinarily, boundary revision occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a chain reaction among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of additional conservative seats. Democrats, for their part, have pushed back with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas attorney general hailed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures representation supportive of his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

On the other hand, opposition party officials lamented the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major party election organization.

A top Democratic leader said the court had yet again damaged its standing by approving a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.