🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an cute small “playful character”. The whale Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a big but very loyal friend. Zephyr has “constant motion” and sways like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.

Thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have become pawns in a struggle between a closed attraction, government authorities and animal rights activists.

But those working directly with the whales say the impassioned debate over their future often fails to consider the complexities of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been closely studied by the people who see them each day.

After the federal government blocked the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held stated it would consider to put them down unless the federal government pays for the upkeep of keeping them alive. Canada’s fisheries minister has rejected that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Scientists say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and social skills point to they are highly cognitive mammals – something a former trainer observed directly.

She spent a significant period as a beluga trainer, a role that required building relationships of the aquatic animals.

“Establishing those relationships over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so wonderful and rewarding.”

The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the details and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She developed a particular love for Eve and Cleopatra with opposing personalities.

“Eve accepted me. The other required effort,” she said. “They transformed the way I perceive relationships.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Her connection with the whales evolved against a backdrop of growing public opposition to their captivity.

During her time at the park, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, succumbed. In total, 19 belugas have died at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility attributes to natural mortality, but which activists say reflects the poor conditions in which they were kept.

The park did not open to the public over the recent season, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes results of the shutdown. “Concrete is deteriorating from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and navigate with fragments in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not comment to a questionnaire, but in the past asserted: “The whales … receive far better veterinary services and constant attention than any individual in the UK, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was fired from the facility in early March following the demise of a beluga, an sick beluga the employees had to put down. She said the park thought information of the death were disclosed to the press and she was released soon after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ future has left Burgess and staff members in anguish. She says the park’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” task, adding any attempts to put down even a individual beluga would require “significant manpower”, trucks and machinery.

“It’s impossible in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

She supports calls for the whales to be transferred right away from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official rejected a bid to transfer the whales to China.

“To approve the request would have meant a perpetual existence in enclosure and a reversion to performance for audiences,” the official stated. “As the public, we know that belugas are meant for the wild, not in pools for our entertainment. I could not in ethical standing authorize an relocation that would prolong the situation these belugas have endured.”

But Burgess said the minister’s comments indicate a more general misunderstanding of the realities of life for belugas raised in confinement.

“The society needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As authorities struggle to find a resolution, suggestions have surfaced, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be let go into the natural habitat of northern regions – where whales are a primary resource of food for Inuit communities.

A proposed protected area in the province of Nova Scotia, which recently received government approval, has proven contentious. The future facility, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, is not yet built. Supporters remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a permanent answer for some of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ fate.

Different voices say the prospect of a sanctuary reflects a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a workable approach in the near future.

Charles Vinick, head of the sanctuary project, said the facility will replicate the mental engagement and nutrition the whales obtain from specialists, albeit in a more expansive environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|